For founders who code with AI

Companies spend 20% on building. You probably spend 87%.

Balance reads your git history and shows how your hours really split between building and selling. Then it tells you the one marketing move to make next. A free skill for Claude Code.

curl -fsSL https://work-work-balance.autobirds.com/install | sh
See a real report ↓
A typical company P&LR&D vs everything that sells it
20%
80%
One founder, last 14 daysmeasured by Balance, Nov 2026
87% building
13%
BuildingMarketing & selling

Building feels like progress. That's the trap.

With an agent, the next feature is an hour away and it always works by evening. Telling people about it is slow, awkward and gets no green checkmark. So the ratio drifts, one reasonable day at a time.

01

It's cheap to build

An AI agent makes every feature feel almost free. Nothing on your screen says stop.

02

Nobody hears about it

A product nobody knows about doesn't sell, however good this week's commits are.

03

You can't see the split

Your calendar doesn't show it and your git graph looks great. Balance puts the number in front of you.

How it works

It runs on your machine, reads commit times and file paths, and nothing else.

Reads git

Commits become hours

Your commits are grouped into work sessions. A commit that only touches your blog, landing page or README counts as marketing, not building.

Reads your posts

Marketing counts too

If you schedule posts in Wingspan, every published post and draft is added to the marketing side, per product.

Tells you the move

One next step

Not a dashboard to admire. One marketing action for your most over-built product, tied to what you just shipped.

A real report

This is the author's own output, last 14 days, five products. It is why Balance exists.

python3 balance.py --days 14target: 20% build
ProjectBuild hMarket hBuild %
cerver27.67.479%over-building → market
kompany22.70.0100%over-building → market
wingspan1.00.0100%over-building → market
All products51.37.487%target 20%
Side projects32.1——off-product time

Side projects took 32 hours, more than half of what went into the products. That one line was worth the install.

It speaks up before the next feature

Balance also runs quietly inside Claude Code. When you ask for another feature on a product that's already far over, you hear about it once, with a better move. Then it does what you decide.

You
add team invites to the dashboard
Claude
Cerver is at 79% build this fortnight (target 20%). You shipped the MCP server on Tuesday and haven't posted about it. Draft that post first, or build anyway?
You
/balance
Claude
87% building across your products. Kompany got 23 hours and zero marketing. Next move: a 3-line post on what Kompany does now that it didn't two weeks ago, with a screenshot.

Install in one line

Run curl -fsSL https://work-work-balance.autobirds.com/install | sh in your terminal.
In Claude Code, type /balance. With no setup it reads every repo in ~/Code, one row each.
Optional: group repos into products and set your target in ~/.claude/skills/balance/config.json.

Questions

Is 20% the right number?

It's what an established company spends on R&D. Early on you may want 40%. Set your own target; the point is to choose it, not drift into it.

Does it read my code?

No. Only commit times and changed file paths, from your local git. Nothing is sent anywhere.

What counts as marketing?

Commits that only touch blog posts, landing pages, READMEs and images, plus posts you publish through Wingspan. You can edit the list.

Calls and demos?

Not counted yet. Hours are an estimate from commit sessions: good enough to see the split, not to bill by.

Do I need Claude Code?

The script runs on its own with Python 3: python3 balance.py. Claude Code adds the next-move advice and the nudge.

What does it cost?

Nothing. It's a script and a skill file. Read both before you run them; they're short.

Find out your real number. It takes ten seconds.

curl -fsSL https://work-work-balance.autobirds.com/install | sh